For many years, I’ve had an ongoing difference of opinion about my spiritual organization. I believe it is not dogmatic. The other party believes that it is. So, I think by establishing definitions, which I have done below, it depends on one’s point of you.

I think I’m following a set of principles, whereas the other person may think I am following a belief system, which I’m not. Principles are based on truth, whereas belief is usually based on some kind of emotional appeal or intellectual preference.

However, I’m conceding that a person who is following an organization that is structured on truth principles, may approach and practice those principles in a such a way that their behavior may border on belief system fanaticism.

Dogma is a set of principles or beliefs firmly held as authoritative and largely unchanging, especially those related to religion.

Principles are similar to beliefs in that they are both closely-held convictions that guide someone’s behavior. However, principles are typically consistent and based in concrete facts, while beliefs may be more subjective and arguable. Principles usually involve some type of moral or ethical reasoning, while beliefs may involve a religious, spiritual, philosophical, or other ideological reasoning. Principles are also typically intended to contribute to the greater good, while beliefs may be designed to benefit one individual or a specific group of people.

Are principles dogmatic? Principles are not dogmatic. They are intended to provide guidance and define expectations for behavior, but there is often room for interpretation and variation depending on the context.

Are beliefs dogmatic? It depends on the context and the content of the beliefs in question. Generally speaking, dogmatic beliefs are those that are rigidly held and not opened to change or questioning, regardless of evidence to the contrary.